Date: 2010-02-20 11:55 am (UTC)
When I first read [livejournal.com profile] katayla's review about HG, that's exactly what I thought; that it sounded a lot like BR. I've only watched the movies, but it was way too confusing and bloody for me so although it definitely gave me long-lasting nightmares, I still don't think it's a brilliant literary work or whatever. I mean, I never truly understood the reasoning behind the whole program.

But did that stop me from reading HG? No, it actually intrigued me because lots of people said HG's awesome. And I had to prove it to myself. And it turned out BR didn't stop me from loving HG either. As far as I'm concerned HG's much better, has way more character depths and so what if it looked like a rip-off? Is it so impossible for two people to have the same idea for a premise despite never knowing each other's works? I read that Suzanne Collins got the idea from watching some news on war and then a teenage competition right afterward and I'm pretty sure she wasn't even familiar with BR. It's just unfair if we condemn her to be a copycat when she simply had the same brilliant idea.

And no book can be 100% original. Maybe years ago, but now? It's all been done before. Just got to work on making an original execution on it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

thelake: (Default)
thelake

June 2019

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 01:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios